Extended War Report

Overview

This is an extended war report for the war 48836 between Toxic Blight and MADE. Data is presented from the side of MADE. Link to the official war report can be found HERE.

Rewards

War outcome for your faction: Victory
Total hits done: 1428
War hits: 1314
Non war hits: 114
Total respect earned: 9065.14
Members contributed: 41/48

---

Rewards for your faction:

Name	Amount	Price
Medium Arms Cache	1	194.78 M
Armor Cache	2	594.9 M
Melee Cache	1	137.51 M

---

Earnings from caches: 927.19 M
Total earnings: 927.19 M¹

¹prices are based on market value or approximate trader prices if market value is unavaliable.

War Preparation

NOTE: Faction Xanax might be different from Prep Xanax due to how personal stats are calculated. In this case, Faction Xanax is more accurate.

Members who did not stack energy before war:

Members who overdosed during war preparations (but could still have stacked):

Members who most likely stacked energy before war (or just used lots of xanax):

Fighting summary

Top 5

Top 5 by overall contribution %

Name	Contribution
spungee	6.58
charlie2015	5.74
Death188	5.18
Xanom	5.11
CEBrence	4.97

Top 5 by War hits

Name	War_Hits
spungee	83
Death188	74
Xanom	73
CEBrence	71
charlie2015	69

Top 5 by Non War hits

Name	Non_War_Hits
Niclan	23
charlie2015	13
spungee	11
MikhailNavaly	10
xXxSEVENxXx	9

Top 5 by Total hits

Name	Total_Hits
spungee	94
charlie2015	82
Death188	74
Xanom	73
CEBrence	71

Top 5 by Assists

Name	Assists
SHARDEN	5
Dem0nSoldi3r	3
xlypso	3
CEBrence	3
spungee	3

Chain savers - List of people who saved the chain with less than 60 seconds remaining.

## [1] "Friendly chain savers:"

Saver	Chain	Time remaining
CEBrence	482	60
CEBrence	480	46
Jambeano	479	57
CEBrence	477	48
ScorpionKill	475	55
Death188	473	40
dadaloglu	467	54
dadaloglu	465	43
LO0PY	464	14
spungee	462	60
dadaloglu	458	38
dadaloglu	457	32
LO0PY	455	24
Rikuto	450	3
LO0PY	448	25
Chewysolo	430	56
Xanom	404	29
Death188	392	40
Chewysolo	383	60
Death188	366	23
CEBrence	362	46
charlie2015	354	49
spungee	333	26
MikhailNavaly	330	52
Perruzzi	318	56
Jak-Jak	317	56
Death188	316	54
Chewysolo	313	16
CEBrence	309	51
CEBrence	308	44
Chewysolo	305	30
Death188	295	57
Xanom	286	34
Rikuto	280	48
ChuffnDalmatron	279	53
LO0PY	272	51
LO0PY	271	47
spungee	268	17
ChuffnDalmatron	263	53
LO0PY	243	43
LO0PY	242	53
Urist-Ironforge	229	43
LO0PY	224	41
Chewysolo	219	51
SHARDEN	212	48
Urist-Ironforge	209	36
charlie2015	199	57
dadaloglu	196	49
dadaloglu	194	56
dadaloglu	193	59
charlie2015	182	36
Jak-Jak	179	44
dadaloglu	178	34
dadaloglu	177	59
dadaloglu	173	58
Jambeano	169	48
charlie2015	166	52
rajo_kobac	157	25
Ubhaya	153	15
ScorpionKill	146	55
xlypso	137	12
CEBrence	130	58
Jambeano	128	56
spungee	104	18
charlie2015	95	39
ChuffnDalmatron	95	45
SHARDEN	89	50
charlie2015	89	53
SHARDEN	88	52
charlie2015	82	29
Ubhaya	81	18
xlypso	80	53
xlypso	74	13
ChuffnDalmatron	67	20
spungee	67	22
Death188	66	2
ChuffnDalmatron	66	54
Jambeano	64	45
spungee	64	60
charlie2015	59	43
Death188	58	20
Death188	57	25
ChuffnDalmatron	55	51
Death188	54	23
xXxSEVENxXx	48	27
spungee	48	54
Jak-Jak	46	27
spungee	45	32
spungee	39	23
charlie2015	39	38
spungee	37	49
ChuffnDalmatron	35	12
Dem0nSoldi3r	35	47
CEBrence	34	48
xXxSEVENxXx	33	28
charlie2015	31	53
Jambeano	28	36
xXxSEVENxXx	28	41

## [1] "No enemy chain saves found!"

Visual summary

Only including members with non-zero contribution

Respect

Respect earned by each member.¹
Total respect earned: 9065.14
Total respect lost: 1163.26
Net respect change: 7901.88²
Average respect earned per attack: 5.47

¹Chain bonuses are ignored in per-member contributions.
²Respect lost will be 0 if using non-faction API key.

War Score

Looking at war score gained and lost by each member.
The calculations IGNORE chain bonuses in order to better reflect actual contribution rather than landing a lucky hit
Total score earned: 7494.18
Total score lost: 4463.2¹
Median net score per member: 45.12²

¹Score lost will be 0 if using non-faction API key.
²Using median instead of mean to avoid extreme values skewing the metric.

Slackers

Members who did not meet 1% contribution cutoff

Name	Contribution
rajo_kobac	0.98
Dem0nSoldi3r	0.91
Sartibartfastt	0.84
Knubbs	0.70
luckylvl	0.63
Perruzzi	0.42
H04X	0.28
ChoppedLiver	0.21
drago_knuckles	0.14
ASANOS	0.07
Spodge	0.00
The__Godfather	0.00
BoDuke13	0.00
iamxaiRNMANEMT	0.00
Wakoy	0.00
DelbySo	0.00
Neto1995	0.00

Energy

Summary of who wasted the most energy and who cost the enemy the most energy.
Calculated by adding up Losses (and Stalemates, Defends, Escapes, Interrupts) and Defends, the multiplying the number by 25.
E_Wasted means the member spent X energy on attacks that failed.
E_Stolen means X energy was wasted by the enemy on attacking the member unsuccessfully.
You might want to take a closer look at members with high E_Wasted values and remind them to pick fights they can win!

¹ These numbers will be 0 if you are using an API key WITHOUT faction access.

Full table

Full table with filters and search

Extra details

Xanax and refill usage

Xanax and Energy refill usage during the war.

Total Xanax used: 40
Xanax costs: 34.13 M
Total Refills used: 16
Refill costs: 12.66 M

Drug cost in plot is in millions.

Booster and can usage

Energy can and Booster usage during the war.

Total Boosters used: 6
Booster costs: 84.96 M
Total Cans used: 7
Can costs: 15.14 M

All Boosters are assumed to be FHCs and Can price is set to average market value for ALL cans.

Booster cost in plot is in 10s of millions.

Armory usage (BETA)

This is a summary of Armory usage during the preparation and war period.
It can be useful for getting a good idea of how much consumables were used during the war in total.

¹ This section will be empty if you are using an API key WITHOUT faction access.

During preparation

## [1] "Preparation Armory usage:"

## [1] "Preparation usage totals:"

## [1] "Only showing consumables"

During war

## [1] "War Armory usage:"

## [1] "War usage totals:"

## [1] "Only showing consumables"

Activity

Member activity during the war in hours.

## [1] "Correlation between activity and contribution:"

## [1] 0.81

Hospital

Summary of times hospitalized during the war

Full table

AI summary (BETA)

This is an experimental portion of the report - an overview of the war generated by AI.
When looking at this section, keep that in mind and take the results with a grain of salt.
Before taking any actions that might impact faction members mentioned in this summary, double-check that there are no mistakes or missed key details.

Post-War Debrief

1) Overall Faction Performance

Roster: 48 members
Direct war participants: 40/48 (83.3%) recorded at least one War_Hit
Zero-War_Hit members: 8/48 (16.7%)
Total War_Hits: 1,314
Faction Net_Score: +3,030.98
E_Wasted: 1,600
E_Stolen: 2,275
Net energy exchange: +675 in the faction’s favor

The faction generated a clearly positive overall score and achieved a favorable energy-denial balance. For every unit of energy wasted on failed outgoing attacks, the faction produced approximately 1.89 Net_Score. The positive E_Stolen–E_Wasted differential (+675) indicates that enemy attacks against faction members were punished more often than the faction’s own failed attacks cost it.

However, output was concentrated. The five largest positive scorers—spungee, CEBrence, ScorpionKill, xXxSEVENxXx, and LO0PY—produced +1,803.92 Net_Score, or roughly 59.5% of the entire faction’s net gain. This is an effective core, but it also shows that the war effort relied heavily on a relatively small group.

Participation was reasonably broad by War_Hit count, but not universal. Eight members failed to register a War_Hit, and most of them also generated a negative score. The faction’s total result was good; its depth and consistency were less so.

---

2) Team Issues & Strategic Bottlenecks

A. Too many zero-impact or negative-impact slots

The eight members with zero War_Hits collectively did not provide enough compensating value through assists, energy denial, or score preservation. Several became substantial points drains:

• Wakoy: 0 War_Hits, -149.28 Net_Score
• DelbySo: 0 War_Hits, -140.10 Net_Score
• BoDuke13: 0 War_Hits, -131.03 Net_Score
• iamxaiRNMANEMT: 0 War_Hits, -84.88 Net_Score
• Spodge: 0 War_Hits, -73.11 Net_Score
• Neto1995: 0 War_Hits, -47.41 Net_Score
• The__Godfather: 0 War_Hits, -30.11 Net_Score
• Niclan: 0 War_Hits, -5.70 Net_Score, despite 23 Non-War_Hits and 1 assist

The main issue is not merely low output; it is that several members absorbed score losses without producing direct war pressure.

B. Failed outgoing attacks were concentrated among otherwise valuable players

The faction’s 1,600 E_Wasted is manageable in aggregate because E_Stolen was higher, but the wasted energy was concentrated among high-volume players. This creates an opportunity for better target screening and timing discipline.

Largest E_Wasted totals:

• spungee: 200
• Astoriah: 175
• SaltyHairSiren: 150
• xXxSEVENxXx: 125
• Jambeano: 100
• LO0PY: 75
• dadaloglu: 75
• Sartibartfastt: 75
• Rikuto: 50
• Xanom: 50
• CEBrence: 50

Not all of this is poor performance—several of these members still scored strongly—but high-output players represent the greatest return on improved targeting. Reducing failed attacks from the core hitters would materially improve future war efficiency.

C. Hospital exposure was high across the roster

The roster accumulated 759 Hospital events/units. Several members were repeatedly unavailable or vulnerable:

• SaltyHairSiren: 31 Hospital
• charlie2015: 27
• BoDuke13: 25
• DelbySo: 25
• Knubbs: 24
• H04X: 24
• spungee: 23
• Death188: 22
• Wakoy: 21
• LO0PY: 18

The high Hospital burden was particularly damaging for members who did not offset it with war output. Hospital time is less concerning when attached to large positive scoring, but it becomes a major strategic weakness for zero-hit or negative-score members.

D. Mugging remained a preventable efficiency loss

Mugging is strategically inferior to Leave/Hospitalize for war progress. The clearest repeat offenders were:

• MikhailNavaly: 8 Mugs
• magnat_88: 5 Mugs
• Rikuto: 4 Mugs
• xXxSEVENxXx: 1 Mug
• N1ChiefRocka: 1 Mug
• Maria_G: 1 Mug
• SaltyHairSiren: 2 Mugs

MikhailNavaly’s 8 Mugs are the most significant finishing-move discipline issue. Despite strong activity, those actions likely reduced the strategic value of his available attack opportunities.

---

3) Individual Highlights — Great Performers

spungee — Best overall war contributor

• 83 War_Hits — highest on the roster
• +512.01 Net_Score — highest on the roster
• 6 Boosters, 7 Cans, 3 Refills — only major recorded resource investor
• 19.481 Activity — highest activity
• 225 E_Stolen — strong defensive energy denial
• 18 Retaliates — exceptional responsiveness

spungee was the war’s most complete contributor: highest volume, highest score, strongest investment, highest activity, and best retaliation count. The only notable concern is 200 E_Wasted, but the total positive output overwhelmingly justified the investment.

CEBrence — Elite efficient scorer

• 71 War_Hits
• +366.08 Net_Score
• 4.97 Contribution
• Only 50 E_Wasted
• 2.15 FairFight

CEBrence combined high volume with excellent score efficiency and avoided the heavier waste levels seen among some other top hitters.

ScorpionKill — High-value, low-downtime attacker

• 62 War_Hits
• +322.73 Net_Score
• 4.48 Contribution
• Only 8 Hospital
• 2.18 FairFight

ScorpionKill delivered one of the cleanest attacking profiles in the faction: strong hit volume, high net output, low hospital exposure, and limited wasted energy.

xXxSEVENxXx — Strong scoring and excellent FairFight

• 57 War_Hits
• +318.09 Net_Score
• 2.60 FairFight
• 4.62 Contribution
• 75 E_Stolen

A highly productive attacker with one of the best FairFight ratings among meaningful-volume contributors. The main improvement area is reducing failed engagements and avoiding non-optimal endings.

LO0PY — Heavy-output core member

• 58 War_Hits
• +284.01 Net_Score
• 4.13 Contribution
• 5.991 Activity
• 100 E_Stolen

LO0PY was a reliable high-volume scorer and meaningful energy-denial asset. The 75 E_Wasted should be reviewed, but overall performance was decisively positive.

Urist-Ironforge, Death188, Xanom, Rikuto

These members formed a strong secondary scoring group:

• Death188: 74 War_Hits, +280.04 Net_Score
• Urist-Ironforge: 47 War_Hits, +276.93 Net_Score, only 25 E_Wasted
• Rikuto: 49 War_Hits, +273.73 Net_Score
• Xanom: 73 War_Hits, +224.79 Net_Score

All produced substantial direct pressure. Rikuto’s score is especially good, though his Mugging count and E_Wasted should be corrected.

High-FairFight specialists

These members displayed especially strong hit efficiency by FairFight:

• Splitwig: 2.70 FairFight, 13 War_Hits, +51.07 Net_Score
• xXxSEVENxXx: 2.60, 57 War_Hits, +318.09
• rajo_kobac: 2.51, 11 War_Hits, +68.25
• ChoppedLiver: 2.50, 3 War_Hits, +7.28
• Chewysolo: 2.44, 19 War_Hits, +69.54

Splitwig’s 2.70 FairFight was the best recorded figure. While the sample size is lower than the top hitters, it indicates excellent target selection and should be preserved as hit volume increases.

Strong defensive energy-denial assets

• DelbySo: 425 E_Stolen
• spungee: 225
• Astoriah: 175
• SaltyHairSiren: 150
• xlypso: 150
• Jambeano: 150

DelbySo was the largest enemy-energy sink by a wide margin. However, this did not translate into a positive score, so it should be viewed as a unique defensive benefit rather than a complete performance success.

---

4) Individual Highlights — Underperformers

ASANOS — Largest individual score drain

• 1 War_Hit
• -278.71 Net_Score — worst on roster
• 4.89 Score_Up versus 283.60 Score_Down
• 24 Hospital
• Only 1.119 Activity

ASANOS was the most damaging individual result. The issue was not E_Wasted—there was none recorded—but severe score loss with virtually no direct war return. This profile requires immediate review of defensive readiness, target exposure, and war participation expectations.

SinMal — Severe negative exchange

• 13 War_Hits
• -181.12 Net_Score
• 242.03 Score_Down
• 25 E_Wasted
• 2 Lost engagements

SinMal did participate, but the faction paid too heavily in score losses relative to the 13 War_Hits delivered. Better target selection and more cautious engagement timing are needed.

Wakoy, DelbySo, and BoDuke13 — Zero-hit score losses

• Wakoy: 0 War_Hits, -149.28
• DelbySo: 0 War_Hits, -140.10
• BoDuke13: 0 War_Hits, -131.03

DelbySo’s 425 E_Stolen offers some mitigation, but all three profiles remain problematic because the faction received no direct war-hit output. Wakoy and BoDuke13 had neither hit production nor compensating energy denial.

H04X and drago_knuckles — Low hit conversion

• H04X: 4 War_Hits, -86.21 Net_Score, 24 Hospital
• drago_knuckles: 2 War_Hits, -92.45 Net_Score, 19 Hospital

Both members had poor output relative to their score losses and hospital burden. Their available windows should have been used more selectively or redirected to safer, coordinated targets.

SaltyHairSiren — Active but strategically inefficient

• 31 War_Hits
• -78.85 Net_Score
• 31 Hospital — highest in faction
• 150 E_Wasted
• 7 Losses
• 2 Mugs

SaltyHairSiren was not inactive; the problem was efficiency. This is a classic case of participation not converting into faction progress. The combination of losses, hospital exposure, failed attacks, and mugging made the 31 War_Hits net-negative.

magnat_88 — Poor finishing discipline and negative return

• 14 War_Hits
• -27.51 Net_Score
• 5 Mugs
• 5 Lost engagements
• 50 E_Wasted

magnat_88’s output was undermined by losses and poor finishing choices. The 5 Mugs are especially costly in a war context.

Other negative or weak-return contributors

• xlypso: 26 War_Hits but -74.69 Net_Score
• Perruzzi: 6 War_Hits, -67.13
• Knubbs: 10 War_Hits, -47.16
• Neto1995: 0 War_Hits, -47.41
• The__Godfather: 0 War_Hits, -30.11
• luckylvl: 9 War_Hits, -28.12
• Dem0nSoldi3r: 12 War_Hits, -22.49
• Viarrah: 15 War_Hits, -21.97

These members should not necessarily be treated equally—some were active and close to break-even—but their target selection, defensive protection, and coordination need improvement before the next war.

---

5) Additional Observations

High activity did not always equal high strategic value

• MikhailNavaly: 15.519 Activity, 30 War_Hits, but only +66.56 Net_Score and 8 Mugs
• charlie2015: 16.135 Activity, 69 War_Hits, +140.53 Net_Score, but 27 Hospital and 50 E_Wasted
• spungee: 19.481 Activity, 83 War_Hits, +512.01 Net_Score

spungee demonstrates the desired model: high activity translated into high score. MikhailNavaly and charlie2015 show that activity alone is not enough; execution and finishing discipline determine whether time converts into faction progress.

High War_Hits did not always mean efficient scoring

• xlypso: 26 War_Hits, -74.69 Net_Score
• SaltyHairSiren: 31 War_Hits, -78.85
• SinMal: 13 War_Hits, -181.12

These cases indicate that the faction needs stronger target-calling or engagement filters. A hit that exposes a member to a larger score loss is not a productive war action.

Retaliation was concentrated

• spungee: 18 Retaliates
• MikhailNavaly: 8 Retaliates
• Jambeano: 2
• dadaloglu: 2

spungee carried most of the recorded retaliation burden. The faction would benefit from broader responsiveness to enemy attacks, especially among members who are online but not producing War_Hits.

Recommended priorities for the next war

1. Set a minimum participation standard: zero-hit members need assigned targets, chain roles, or defensive responsibilities.
2. Improve target screening: reduce E_Wasted among high-volume attackers first; this offers the largest immediate efficiency gain.
3. Enforce Leave/Hospitalize finishing rules: MikhailNavaly, magnat_88, and Rikuto require particular attention.
4. Protect high-risk negative scorers: ASANOS, SinMal, H04X, drago_knuckles, and SaltyHairSiren need tighter engagement discipline.
5. Build around the proven core: spungee, CEBrence, ScorpionKill, xXxSEVENxXx, LO0PY, Urist-Ironforge, Death188, Xanom, and Rikuto should anchor future coordinated pushes.

Bottom line: The faction won the efficiency battle overall through a strong core of high-volume scorers and favorable enemy-energy denial. The principal weakness was uneven roster execution: too many zero-hit members, several major negative score drains, and preventable losses from wasted attacks and mugging.